Ohio Valley Outdoors Magazine

Serving Eastern Ohio, Western Pennsylvania & Northern West Virginia

Feature: May - June  2004

 

Home

About Us

Previous Issues

Subscribe

Club News

State Reports

Photo Showcase

Contests

WhereTo Hunt/Fish

Advertise In OVO

Help Wanted

Lynx

 

 

 

 

 

 PGC Field Crews Take Buck Study to Another Level

                                                                                                                         

A broken nose, a stitched finger and a stuck pickup truck.

All of this before lunchtime, on a frigid February morning. Undaunted, the crew of six graduate students

 and their field supervisor recover to catch eight deer, including two button bucks, which are the focus of

 their efforts.  Just another day in the lives of the Armstrong County Field Crew working to collect data

 for the Pennsylvania Game Commission’s antlered deer study.  The study was initiated to gain better

 insight into buck survival rates, cause-specific mortality, and movement patterns in Pennsylvania.

 

There are two active study sites in the state that include Armstrong and Centre counties. The Armstrong

 County site represents agricultural habitat while the Centre County site is more representative of large

 forested habitat.  Prior to this study, most similar research had been done within wildlife refuges or within

 enclosures where hunting is not permitted. The study is being completed in cooperation with Penn State

 University and PhD. candidate Eric Long.  Ultimately, the commission hopes to learn more about causes

 of deer mortality, the movement of bucks from six months to 30 months of age, including how and when

 they disperse, and the changes in male age structure due to antler restrictions.  They also hope to gain a

 better understanding of hunters’ opinions and satisfaction levels.

 

I had the opportunity to spend two days volunteering with the Armstrong County Field Crew in    February, and became enamored with the professionalism and care shown by this group of dedicated graduate

 students, some of whom come from New York, Ohio and Illinois to participate in the study.  Upon entering  the house that the crew affectionately refers to as “headquarters,” which also doubles as the group’s living  quarters, I was greeted with the sights, sounds and smells that reminded me of an over occupied frat house.  The unmistakable aroma of a slightly overdue garbage removal, the hustle and bustle of six college students  fighting for breakfast and various items strewn about the entryway resembled a poor man’s Real World as  depicted by MTV.

 

After meeting the crew, Josh Schrecengost, Armstrong County field supervisor, arrived to outline the

 agenda for the day. Schrecengost is an Armstrong County native, and has been participating in the study

 since it began in 2002.  He spent his first year as a crewmember prior to supervising the Armstrong County  crew.  “I’ve been hunting all of my life and was always fascinated by deer,” he said. “I look at this study

 as an opportunity of a lifetime. Not many people get the chance to work so closely with something they love.”  This day would be similar to most during the winter months of the study. Beginning at 8:30 a.m., the

 equipment needed for the day is checked and loaded in time for the usual 9 a.m. departure. First on the

 agenda is checking clover traps, which were strategically baited with corn and placed throughout several

 properties owned by cooperating landowners.

 Clover traps are simply large box traps designed for deer capture. They employ a simple trip wire mechanism  with a trap door at the rear. The traps are named after their inventor whose last name is Clover, and not for  the type of bait used to lure the deer in.  Most commonly, the traps are baited with corn purchased at a local  farm.  The traps being used as part of the study have been modified by the commission and function much  more efficiently than the originals.

Riding along with part of the crew in a small, extended cab pickup truck, it was easy to sense everyone’s

 growing excitement level. We stumbled down a narrow, snow-covered road, anticipating the successful

 day that may be ahead of us.  The object of the game is to capture and radio collar as many juvenile or

adult bucks as possible for future monitoring.  When a deer is found in a trap, the crew rushes to it, throws   the door open, and tackles the deer to the ground for processing. Once on the ground, it is fitted with a

 facemask that covers its eyes, providing a calming effect.  No tranquilizers are used in conjunction with the  clover traps, only speed and muscle. Schrecengost described tackling a fully healthy and capable deer as

 “a pure adrenaline rush. We actually argue over who is going to get to tackle on a particular day. To settle  it, we just take turns now.”

 

Not knowing fully what to expect and never having seen a person tackle a deer, I imagined what the first

 capture would be like. Suddenly the truck slammed to a stop with three crew members bailing out shouting  “we have a double.”  It happened so fast that I was still sitting in the truck while the two captured deer

 were being released from the cage.  Two deer captured in one clover trap is not uncommon. In this instance,  the deer had been captured once before and did not need to be processed.

 

The ground rules were now set. If I wanted to be more than a distant spectator of the capture process,

 I needed to be on my toes and ready to eject from the truck at a moment’s notice. Speed is critical to the  well-being of the captured deer, with most being processed in less than two minutes. The less stress on the

 animal during processing, the better chance it has of escaping healthy and unscathed.  By the end of the

 clover trap run, we captured a total of eight deer, including two button bucks that we radio collared for

 future monitoring.  According to Schrecengost, this was a typical success rate for the 2004 trapping season.

              “This has been the best year of the study so far with regard to the number of deer we put on the air.
             This year we caught 76 juvenile males and 45 adult males.”  He attributed the high number of adult male
             captures to the recently implemented antler restrictions in Pennsylvania.   “We’re up from 13 adult bucks
             last year to 76 this year. I personally believe in the effectiveness of the antler restrictions, and I think the
              results we’ve had speak for themselves.”  In addition to bucks, the crew has captured 120 juvenile does
             and 94 adult does this year.

One day was particularly memorable for Schrecengost.

“We had 36 active traps set on a Sunday evening. When we did our Monday run, we captured and collard nine button bucks and a handful of does. On top of that, we captured and radio collared 10 button bucks and five adult bucks under two drop nets.”

Normally, the crew is thrilled to put 10 bucks on the air in a week’s time, let alone a single day.

Once all of the clover traps are checked for the day, the crew typically reunites at headquarters to grab a quick lunch prior to completing daily tasks such as setting new drop nets, rebaiting clover traps and prebaiting future trapping locations.

This time is also spent cultivating relationships with landowners who are participating in the program, or talking with potential new landowner partners. These daily tasks typically conclude just in time to head to the drop net locations for the evening watch.

On most occasions, the crew divides in half to cover two drop nets on a given evening. Drop netting is somewhat more complicated than utilizing clover traps because there are usually several deer to process at one time, making tranquilizers a necessary tool to ensure the safety of the deer.

Once several deer are under the net, it is released via a remote control. Immediately after the release, the crewmembers converge on the trapped deer and begin the tagging and radio collaring process.

During the 2003 trapping season, innovative crew member Greg Huchko devised a plan that involved sneak attacks on unsuspecting deer. He thought that it would be interesting to try blind drops in certain areas to see what might happen. As it turned out, this method yielded an approximate 15 percent button buck success rate.  “We routinely use the blind drop method now,” said Schrecengost.

Sometimes watching a drop net can be like spending a day on stand in frigid weather without seeing a single deer. On the evening I participated in drop netting with the crew, not a single deer made its way under the trap. Only the crystal-clear sky filled with millions of stars kept my attention.

I found myself wondering how the crews could do this night after night. Even if they were having success, it had to be tiresome. I found my respect and appreciation for their work growing by the minute.

I was particularly impressed with the crew’s passion for processing the deer quickly and safely. Although none of them would admit it, I sensed that the well-being of the deer took precedence over their own safety.

Schrecengost indicated that, “We love these animals, and we want to get them in and out as fast as possible. Should a deer suffer even a minor injury during processing, it hurts all of us.”

If the everyday grind of the job isn’t tough enough to deal with, the crew members have few options for off the job recreation due to the remoteness of the study area. Most of the time the crew goes bowling for entertainment at the Greendale, an unusual establishment that doubles as a restaurant and bowling alley in the middle of nowhere.

“Most of the crew sleeps for entertainment,” said Schrecengost, “or if they can, they try to get in a little fishing. For most of us, though, sleep is our favorite type of recreation.”

When asked why anyone, whether they are interested in deer research or not, would be willing to live in a small house with five other people and work 12-hour days for a modest salary, Schrecengost offered a simple answer.

“This could be a once in a lifetime opportunity to study whitetails in a very hands-on environment. It’s great experience for all of us involved.”

He added, “The living environment really brings the crew closer, and provides a great setting for the type of teamwork that’s needed to pull this project off. We all know what each other are going to do, even before we do it.”

The crews are largely selected by Pennsylvania Game Commission Biometrician Chris Rosenberry, PhD.

“I don’t know how he does it,” said Schrecengost. “We’ve had nothing but great people to work with, and each member is as dedicated as the next. We’re really more like a big family.”

For more information about the buck study and other current deer research being conducted by the Pennsylvania Game Commission, visit their website at www.pgc.state.pa.us, select wildlife and then deer.